Cefepime-taniborbactam and CERTAIN-1: Can we treat carbapenem-resistant infections?

Wagenlehner and colleagues1 demonstrated non-inferiority and superiority with respect to a primary endpoint of composite success (microbiological plus clinical) of cefepime/taniborbactam vs. meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis caused by carbapenem-susceptible gram-negative bacteria in adults. A major area of interest in real-world application of cefepime/taniborbactam is its potential role in treating carbapenem-resistant infections, which deserves further investigation.

Changes of PK/PD of Meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock and exploration of clinical rational administration plan: a prospective exploratory study.

This study aimed to explore the changes of pharmacokinetic parameters after meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock after gastrointestinal perforation, and to simulate the probability of different dosing regimens achieving different pharmacodynamic goals. The study included 12 patients, and utilized high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to monitor the plasma concentration of meropenem. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and %fT > 4MIC was compared among simulated dosing regimens. The results showed that in 96 blood samples from 12 patients, the clearance (CL) of meropenem in the normal and abnormal creatinine clearance subgroups were 7.7 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 1.1 L/h, respectively, and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) was 22.6 ± 5.1 and 17.2 ± 5.8 L, respectively. 2. Regardless of the subgroup, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h regimen achieved a PTA > 90% when MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L. 1.0 g/q6h infusion regimen compared with other regimen, in most cases, the probability of making PTA > 90% is higher. For patients at low MIC, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. For patients at high MIC, a dose regimen of 1.0 g/q6 h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. Further research is needed to confirm this exploratory result.

Insights and Opinions of Critical Care Healthcare Professionals in the Management of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Cases and Antibiotic-Resistant Infections in the Intensive Care Unit Setting: A Survey-Based Approach.

INTRODUCTION: A survey-based approach to managing antibiotic-resistant infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, with a focus on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) cases, was conducted. Among CRE, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase 1 (NDM-1) is a carbapenemase that is resistant to ß-lactam antibiotics and has a broader spectrum of antimicrobial resistance than other carbapenemase types. The article explains that healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and that carbapenem in combination with other antibiotics are the most potent class of antimicrobial agents effective in treating life-threatening bacterial infections, including those caused by resistant strains. AIM: The survey aimed to gather critical care healthcare professionals (HCPs') opinions on their current practices in managing infections acquired in the hospital and ICU settings, with a focus on CRE cases, specifically NDM-1 and other antibiotic-resistant infections. METHODS: Responses from critical care healthcare professionals, including online surveys and in-person interviews, to gain insights into the management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. The findings related to the insights on the prevalence of bacterial flora, clinical experiences on efficacy and safety of meropenem sulbactam ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (MSE) in CRE cases, and various combination therapies of antibiotics used to treat antibiotic-resistant infections in ICU setting were evaluated. RESULTS: Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria were the most common bacteria in cultures, followed by Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. NDM-1 was the type of carbapenemase found in around 50% of CRE patients. MSE is among the most preferred antibiotics besides colistin, polymyxin B, and ceftazidime avibactum for CRE cases and specifically for NDM-1 cases due to its high rate of efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: The article concludes with a discussion on the antibiotics used in response to CRE cases, reporting that critical care HCP considers MSE with high efficacy and safe antibiotic combination and was used as both monotherapy and in combination with other antibiotics. The survey highlights the need for exploring and better understanding the role of MSE in the management of CRE infections, especially in NDM-1.

Bacteriological profile, antimicrobial susceptibility, and factors associated with urinary tract infection in pregnant women.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common bacterial complication in pregnancy. The study aimed to estimate the prevalence, risk factors, and bacterial etiology of UTI during pregnancy and determine the efficacy of antimicrobial drugs in treating UTIs. METHODOLOGY: Urine specimens and clinical data were collected from pregnant women who attended primary health centers in Erbil, Iraq. All specimens were cultured on appropriate media and identified by standard microbiological methods. The pregnant women were grouped into symptomatic UTI group, asymptomatic bacteriuria group, and the control group. The agar dilution method was used to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. RESULTS: Among the 5,042 pregnant women included in this study, significant bacteriuria was found in 625 (12.40%) of the cases, and 198 (31.68%) had symptomatic UTI, of which 43.59% were diagnosed during the third trimester. Out of the 643 bacteria isolated, 33.28% were symptomatic UTI, of which 43.59% developed during the third trimester. There was a significant difference in the bacterial etiology between symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (p = 0.002), as well as between cystitis and pyelonephritis (p = 0.017). The most common bacterial species isolated was Escherichia coli, which was susceptible to fosfomycin (100%), meropenem (99.45%), and nitrofurantoin (97.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women are more likely to develop UTI in the third trimester. Escherichia coli is the predominant pathogen. The study suggests the use of fosfomycin, meropenem, and nitrofurantoin for the treatment of UTI. No Gram-positive isolates were resistant to daptomycin.

A multicenter clinical epidemiology of pediatric pneumococcal meningitis in China: results from the Chinese Pediatric Bacterial Meningitis Surveillance (CPBMS) 2019-2020.

Objective: To analyze the clinical epidemiological characteristics including clinical features, disease prognosis of pneumococcal meningitis (PM), and drug sensitivity of S. pneumoniae isolates in Chinese children. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical, laboratory microbiological data of 160 hospitalized children less than 15 years of age with PM from January 2019 to December 2020 in 33 tertiary hospitals in China. Results: A total of 160 PM patients were diagnosed, including 103 males and 57 females The onset age was 15 days to 15 years old, and the median age was 1 year and 3 months. There were 137 cases (85.6%) in the 3 months to <5 years age group, especially in the 3 months to <3 years age group (109 cases, 68.2%); S. pneumoniae was isolated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture in 95(35.6%), and 57(35.6%) in blood culture. The positive rates of S. pneumoniae detection by CSF metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS)and antigen detection method were 40.2% (35/87) and 26.9% (21/78). Fifty-five cases (34.4%) had one or more predisposing factors of bacterial meningitis; and 113 cases (70.6%) had one or more extracranial infection diseases Fever (147, 91.9%) was the most common clinical symptom, followed by vomiting (61, 38.1%) and altered mental status (47,29.4%). Among 160 children with PM, the main intracranial imaging complications were subdural effusion and (or) empyema in 43 cases (26.9%), hydrocephalus in 24 cases (15.0%), cerebral abscess in 23 cases (14.4%), intracranial hemorrhage in 8 cases (5.0%), and other cerebrovascular diseases in 13 cases (8.1%) including encephalomalacia, cerebral infarction, and encephalatrophy. Subdural effusion and (or) empyema and hydrocephalus mainly occurred in children < 1 years old (90.7% (39/43) and 83.3% (20/24), respectively). 17 cases with PM (39.5%) had more than one intracranial imaging abnormality. S. pneumoniae isolates were completely sensitive to vancomycin (100.0%, 75/75), linezolid (100.0%,56/56), ertapenem (6/6); highly sensitive to levofloxacin (81.5%, 22/27), moxifloxacin (14/17), rifampicin (96.2%, 25/26), and chloramphenicol (91.3%, 21/23); moderately sensitive to cefotaxime (56.1%, 23/41), meropenem (51.1%, 23/45) and ceftriaxone (63.5, 33/52); less sensitive to penicillin (19.6%, 27/138) and clindamycin (1/19); completely resistant to erythromycin (100.0%, 31/31). The cure and improvement rate were 22.5% (36/160)and 66.3% (106/160), respectively. 18 cases (11.3%) had an adverse outcome, including 6 cases withdrawing treatment therapy, 5 cases unhealed, 5 cases died, and 2 recurrences. S. pneumoniae was completely susceptible to vancomycin (100.0%, 75/75), linezolid (100.0%, 56/56), and ertapenem (6/6); susceptible to cefotaxime, meropenem, and ceftriaxone in the order of 56.1% (23/41), 51.1% (23/45), and 63.5 (33/52); completely resistant to erythromycin (100.0%, 31/31). Conclusion: Pediatric PM is more common in children aged 3 months to < 3 years old. Intracranial complications mostly occur in children < 1 year of age with fever being the most common clinical manifestations and subdural effusion and (or) empyema and hydrocephalus being the most common complications, respectively. CSF non-culture methods can facilitate improving the detection rate of pathogenic bacteria. More than 10% of PM children had adverse outcomes. S. pneumoniae strains are susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, ertapenem, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and chloramphenicol.

A case report on rapid development of simultaneous liver and musculature calcifications in severe sepsis.

A 76-year-old Malay female presented with 2 days history of fever and vomiting. She was found to have Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia with no clear intra-abdominal cause on the initial computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP). She clinically improved with 2 weeks duration of intravenous meropenem. She subsequently developed septic shock and a repeated CTAP demonstrated increased hepatic parenchymal density with extensive parenchymal calcifications. Curvilinear calcifications were seen in the paraspinal and pelvic musculature.

Effect modification of dosing strategy (AUC or trough) on AKI associated with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime and meropenem.

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) are commonly used in combination for sepsis. Studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with TZP and VAN compared to FEP or MEM. VAN guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring over trough (Tr) to minimize the risk of AKI. We investigated the association of AKI and MAKE-30 with the two VAN monitoring strategies when used in combination with TZP or FEP/MEM. Adult patients between 2015 and 2019 with VAN > 72 hours were included. Patients with AKI prior to or within 48 hours of VAN or baseline CrCl of ≤30 mL/min were excluded. Four cohorts were defined: FEP/MEM/Tr, FEP/MEM/AUC, TZP/Tr, and TZP/AUC. A Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to model AKI as a function of the incidence rate of at-risk days, testing monitoring strategy as a treatment effect modification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model MAKE-30. Overall incidence of AKI was 18.6%; FEP/MEM/Tr = 115 (14.6%), FEP/MEM/AUC = 52 (14.9%), TZP/Tr = 189 (26%), and TZP/AUC = 96 (17.1%) (P < 0.001). Both drug group [(TZP; P = 0.0085)] and monitoring strategy [(Tr; P = 0.0007)] were highly associated with the development of AKI; however, the effect was not modified with interaction term [(TZP*Tr); 0.085)]. The odds of developing MAKE-30 were not different between any group and FEP/MEM/AUC. The effect of VAN/TZP on the development of AKI was not modified by the VAN monitoring strategy (AUC vs trough). MAKE-30 outcomes were not different among the four cohorts.

Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of pancreatic necrosis.

PURPOSE: To date, there are three published guidelines discussing management of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) with conflicting recommendations. Specifically, The World Society of Emergency Surgery lists piperacillin-tazobactam as a treatment option in addition to meropenem and ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole. Piperacillin-tazobactam may serve as an effective carbapenem-sparing alternative. Although previous studies shed light on antimicrobial penetration data, there is a lack of clinical data comparing piperacillin-tazobactam to meropenem. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of IPN. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted across three institutions. Patients with IPN who received either meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam from January 2015 to December 2020 were included. The primary composite outcome was the incidence of 90-day clinical failure, which encompassed 90-day all-cause mortality and 90-day intra-abdominal infection recurrence. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, antimicrobial duration of therapy, and the need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: We identified 229 patients with IPN that received either meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam during hospital admission. After screening, 63 patients were included in the study. Incidence of 90-day clinical failure was observed in 33 % of the meropenem group and 50 % in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (OR, 1.98; 95 % CI 0.57 to 7.01, p = 0.259). The meropenem group had a lower incidence of 90-day infection recurrence in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (56 % vs 29 %, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin-tazobactam may be an efficacious carbapenem-sparing treatment alternative for infected pancreatic necrosis.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of CTZ/TAZ for the treatment of ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Resistant bacterial infections, particularly those caused by gram-negative pathogens, are associated with high mortality and economic burdens. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated efficacy comparable to meropenem in patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia in the ASPECT-NP study. One cost-effectiveness analysis in the United States revealed that ceftolozane/tazobactam was cost effective, but no Japanese studies have been conducted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared to meropenem for patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia from a health care payer perspective. METHODS: A hybrid decision-tree Markov decision-analytic model with a 5-year time horizon were developed to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life-years and to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in the treatment of patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Clinical outcomes were based on the ASPECT-NP study, costs were based on the national fee schedule of 2022, and utilities were based on published data. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also conducted to assess the robustness of our modeled estimates. RESULTS: According to our base-case analysis, compared with meropenem, ceftolozane/tazobactam increased the total costs by 424,731.22 yen (£2,626.96) and increased the quality-adjusted life-years by 0.17, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 2,548,738 yen (£15,763.94) per quality-adjusted life-year gained for ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that although the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio remained below 5,000,000 yen (£30,925) for most of the parameters, the incremental net monetary benefit may have been less than 0 depending on the treatment efficacy outcome, especially the cure rate and mortality rate for MEPM and mortality rate for CTZ/TAZ. 53.4% of the PSA simulations demonstrated that CTZ/TAZ was more cost-effective than MEPM was. CONCLUSION: Although incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was below ï¿¥5,000,000 in base-case analysis, whether ceftolozane/tazobactam is a cost-effective alternative to meropenem for ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in Japan remains uncertain. Future research should examine the unobserved heterogeneity across patient subgroups and decision-making settings, to characterise decision uncertainty and its consequences so as to assess whether additional research is required.

[Clinical practice guidelines for meropenem therapy in neonatal sepsis (2024)]. / 美罗培南治疗新生儿脓毒症的临床实践指南（2024年版）.

Meropenem is one of the most widely used special-grade antimicrobial agents in the treatment of neonatal sepsis. However, its irrational use has led to an increasingly severe problem of bacterial multidrug resistance. The guideline was developed following standardized methods and procedures, and provides 12 recommendations specifically addressing 9 clinical issues. The recommendations cover various aspects of meropenem use in neonates, including timing of administration, recommended dosage, extended infusion, monitoring and assessment, antimicrobial adjustment strategies, treatment duration, and treatment strategies for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. The aim of the guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance for the rational use of meropenem in neonates with sepsis.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility data of global meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates causing pneumonia: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Program, 2014-2021, and re-estimations of susceptibility breakpoints and appropriate dosages of important antibiotics for pneumonia treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the susceptibility of globally pneumonia-causing meropenem-resistant (MEM-R) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates against important antibiotics and estimate appropriate dosages of indicated antibiotics. METHODS: We extracted the 2014-2021 Antimicrobial Testing of Leadership Surveillance database regarding the susceptibility of MEM-R A. baumannii isolates causing pneumonia against important antibiotics. The susceptibility and carbapenemase-encoding gene (CPEG) data of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates from patients hospitalized in intensive care units of five major regions were analyzed. The susceptibility breakpoints (SBP) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2022, other necessary criteria [SBP of MIC for colistin, 2 mg/L, in the CLSI 2018; and cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL), 16 mg/L], and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of indicated antibiotics were employed. RESULTS: Applying the aforementioned criteria, we observed the susceptible rates of colistin, minocycline, and CFP-SUL against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates globally (n = 2905) were 93.2%, 69.1%, and 26.3%, respectively. Minocycline was significantly more active in vitro (MIC ≤4 mg/L) against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates collected from North and South America compared to those from other regions (>90% vs. 58-72%). Additionally, blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 were the predominant CPEG in pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: After deliberative estimations, dosages of 200 mg minocycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 8 mg/L), 100 mg tigecycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 1 mg/L), and 160 mg nebulized colistin methanesulphonate every 8 h (SBP, 2 mg/L) are needed for the effective treatment of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates.

Simulated drug disposition in critically ill patients to evaluate effective PK/PD targets for combating Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to meropenem.

Bacterial infections, including those caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often lead to sepsis, necessitating effective antibiotic treatment like carbapenems. The key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index correlated to carbapenem efficacy is the fraction time of unbound plasma concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen (%fT > MIC). While multiple targets exist, determining the most effective one for critically ill patients remains a matter of debate. This study evaluated meropenem's bactericidal potency and its ability to combat drug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa under three representative PK/PD targets: 40% fT > MIC, 100% fT > MIC, and 100% fT > 4× MIC. The hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) was constructed, validated, and subsequently inoculated with a substantial Pseudomonas aeruginosa load (1 × 108 CFU/mL). Different meropenem regimens were administered to achieve the specified PK/PD targets. At specified intervals, samples were collected from the HFIM system and subjected to centrifugation. The resulting supernatant was utilized to determine drug concentrations, while the precipitates were used to track changes in both total and drug-resistant bacterial populations over time by the spread plate method. The HFIM accurately reproduced meropenem's pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. All three PK/PD target groups exhibited a rapid bactericidal response within 6 h of the initial treatment. However, the 40% fT > MIC and 100% fT > MIC groups subsequently showed bacterial resurgence and resistance, whereas the 100% fT > 4× MIC group displayed sustained bactericidal activity with no evidence of drug resistance. The HFIM system revealed that maintaining 100% fT > 4× MIC offers a desirable microbiological response for critically ill patients, demonstrating strong bactericidal capacity and effective prevention of drug resistance.

Removal of common antimicrobial agents by sustained low-efficiency dialysis.

Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is paramount for treating infections in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy; however, little is known about antimicrobial removal by sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). The objective was to quantify the removal of cefepime, daptomycin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin in patients undergoing SLED. Adult patients ≥18 years with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end-stage kidney disease receiving one of the select antimicrobials and requiring SLED were included. Blood and dialysate flow rates were maintained at 250 and 100 mL/min, respectively. Simultaneous arterial and venous blood samples for the analysis of antibiotic concentrations were collected hourly for 8 hours during SLED (on-SLED). Arterial samples were collected every 2 hours for up to 6 hours while not receiving SLED (off-SLED) for the calculation of SLED clearance, half-life (t1/2) on-SLED and off-SLED, and the fraction of removal by SLED (fD). Twenty-one patients completed the study: 52% male, mean age (±SD) 53 ± 13 years, and mean weight of 98 ± 30 kg. Eighty-six percent had AKI, and 4 patients were receiving cefepime, 3 daptomycin, 10 meropenem, 6 piperacillin-tazobactam, and 13 vancomycin. The average SLED time was 7.3 ± 1.1 hours, and the mean ultrafiltration rate was 95 ± 52 mL/hour (range 10-211). The t1/2 on-SLED was substantially lower than the off-SLED t1/2 for all antimicrobials, and the SLED fD varied between 44% and 77%. An 8-hour SLED session led to significant elimination of most antimicrobials evaluated. If SLED is performed, modification of the dosing regimen is warranted to avoid subtherapeutic concentrations.

Cefepime-Taniborbactam in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are global health threats. Cefepime-taniborbactam is an investigational ß-lactam and ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa expressing serine and metallo-ß-lactamases. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned hospitalized adults with complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), including acute pyelonephritis, in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous cefepime-taniborbactam (2.5 g) or meropenem (1 g) every 8 hours for 7 days; this duration could be extended up to 14 days in case of bacteremia. The primary outcome was both microbiologic and clinical success (composite success) on trial days 19 to 23 in the microbiologic intention-to-treat (microITT) population (patients who had a qualifying gram-negative pathogen against which both study drugs were active). A prespecified superiority analysis of the primary outcome was performed after confirmation of noninferiority. RESULTS: Of the 661 patients who underwent randomization, 436 (66.0%) were included in the microITT population. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 years, and 38.1% were 65 years of age or older. In the microITT population, 57.8% of the patients had complicated UTI, 42.2% had acute pyelonephritis, and 13.1% had bacteremia. Composite success occurred in 207 of 293 patients (70.6%) in the cefepime-taniborbactam group and in 83 of 143 patients (58.0%) in the meropenem group. Cefepime-taniborbactam was superior to meropenem regarding the primary outcome (treatment difference, 12.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 22.2; P = 0.009). Differences in treatment response were sustained at late follow-up (trial days 28 to 35), when cefepime-taniborbactam had higher composite success and clinical success. Adverse events occurred in 35.5% and 29.0% of patients in the cefepime-taniborbactam group and the meropenem group, respectively, with headache, diarrhea, constipation, hypertension, and nausea the most frequently reported; the frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime-taniborbactam was superior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated UTI that included acute pyelonephritis, with a safety profile similar to that of meropenem. (Funded by Venatorx Pharmaceuticals and others; CERTAIN-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03840148.).

Ethambutol and meropenem/clavulanate synergy promotes enhanced extracellular and intracellular killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Increasing evidence supports the repositioning of beta-lactams for tuberculosis (TB) therapy, but further research on their interaction with conventional anti-TB agents is still warranted. Moreover, the complex cell envelope of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) may pose an additional obstacle to beta-lactam diffusion. In this context, we aimed to identify synergies between beta-lactams and anti-TB drugs ethambutol (EMB) and isoniazid (INH) by assessing antimicrobial effects, intracellular activity, and immune responses. Checkerboard assays with H37Rv and eight clinical isolates, including four drug-resistant strains, exposed that only treatments containing EMB and beta-lactams achieved synergistic effects. Meanwhile, the standard EMB and INH association failed to produce any synergy. In Mtb-infected THP-1 macrophages, combinations of EMB with increasing meropenem (MEM) concentrations consistently displayed superior killing activities over the individual antibiotics. Flow cytometry with BODIPY FL vancomycin, which binds directly to the peptidoglycan (PG), confirmed an increased exposure of this layer after co-treatment. This was reinforced by the high IL-1ß secretion levels found in infected macrophages after incubation with MEM concentrations above 5 mg/L, indicating an exposure of the host innate response sensors to pathogen-associated molecular patterns in the PG. Our findings show that the proposed impaired access of beta-lactams to periplasmic transpeptidases is counteracted by concomitant administration with EMB. The efficiency of this combination may be attributed to the synchronized inhibition of arabinogalactan and PG synthesis, two key cell wall components. Given that beta-lactams exhibit a time-dependent bactericidal activity, a more effective pathogen recognition and killing prompted by this association may be highly beneficial to optimize TB regimens containing carbapenems.IMPORTANCEAddressing drug-resistant tuberculosis with existing therapies is challenging and the treatment success rate is lower when compared to drug-susceptible infection. This study demonstrates that pairing beta-lactams with ethambutol (EMB) significantly improves their efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). The presence of EMB enhances beta-lactam access through the cell wall, which may translate into a prolonged contact between the drug and its targets at a concentration that effectively kills the pathogen. Importantly, we showed that the effects of the EMB and meropenem (MEM)/clavulanate combination were maintained intracellularly. These results are of high significance considering that the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration is the main determinant of beta-lactam efficacy. Moreover, a correlation was established between incubation with higher MEM concentrations during macrophage infection and increased IL-1ß secretion. This finding unveils a previously overlooked aspect of carbapenem repurposing against tuberculosis, as certain Mtb strains suppress the secretion of this key pro-inflammatory cytokine to evade host surveillance.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem in critically ill adult patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the factors influencing imipenem/cilastatin (IMI) and meropenem (MEM) concentrations in critically ill adult patients and the role of these concentrations in the clinical outcome. METHODS: Plasma trough concentrations of IMI and MEM were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography. A target value of 100%-time above MIC was used for the drugs. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were included, with 87 receiving IMI and 99 receiving MEM. The percentages of patients reaching the target IMI and MEM concentrations were 44.8% and 38.4%, respectively. The proportions of patients infected with drug-resistant bacteria were 57.5% and 69.7% in the IMI group and MEM group, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for an IMI concentration that did not reach the target were infection with drug-resistant bacteria, and those for MEM were infection with drug-resistant bacteria, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and diabetes mellitus. A total of 47.1% of patients had good outcomes in the IMI cohort, and 38.1% of patients had good outcomes in the MEM cohort. The duration of mechanical ventilation and IMI concentration were associated with ICU stay in patients in the IMI cohort, while MEM concentration and severe pneumonia affected the clinical outcome of patients in the MEM cohort. CONCLUSION: Infection with drug-resistant bacteria is an important factor influencing whether IMI and MEM concentrations reach the target. Furthermore, IMI and MEM concentrations are associated with the clinical outcome, and elevated doses of IMI and MEM should be given to patients who are infected with drug-resistant bacteria.

Which trial do we need? Combination antimicrobial therapy for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Meropenem therapy will be open-label, while tobramycin or placebo will be administered in a double-blind fashion. The primary trial endpoint will be a composite hierarchical outcome of 1) 28-day all-cause mortality, 2) ventilator-free days, and 3) modified time to clinical stability, evaluated using a win ratio methodology (see below). Secondary trial outcomes will include frequency of safety events (acute kidney injury), resolution of circulatory shock, recurrent HABP, and emergence of meropenem resistance both during treatment and in cases of recurrent infection. Using simulation studies to inform sample size calculations, we estimate that recruitment of 130 patients per treatment arm would provide at least 80% power to detect a win ratio of 1.50 while preserving a two-sided type 1 error rate of 0.05.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Bayesian-Guided Beta-Lactam Infusion Strategy and Associated Bacterial Resistance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Severe Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing health concern worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of beta-lactam infusion on the emergence of bacterial resistance in patients with severe pneumonia in the intensive care unit. METHODS: Adult intensive care patients receiving cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam for severe pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacteria were randomized to receive beta-lactams as an intermittent (30 minutes) or continuous (24 hours) infusion. Respiratory samples for culture and susceptibility testing, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), were collected once a week for up to 4 weeks. Beta-lactam plasma concentrations were measured and therapeutic drug monitoring was performed using Bayesian software as the standard of care. RESULTS: The study was terminated early owing to slow enrollment. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Cefepime (n = 22) was the most commonly prescribed drug at randomization, followed by piperacillin (n = 8) and meropenem (n = 5). Nineteen patients were randomized into the continuous infusion arm and 16 into the intermittent infusion arm. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common respiratory isolate (n = 19). Eighteen patients were included in the final analyses. No differences in bacterial resistance were observed between arms ( P = 0.67). No significant differences in superinfection ( P = 1), microbiological cure ( P = 0.85), clinical cure at day 7 ( P = 0.1), clinical cure at end of therapy ( P = 0.56), mortality ( P = 1), intensive care unit length of stay ( P = 0.37), or hospital length of stay ( P = 0.83) were observed. Achieving 100% ƒT > MIC ( P = 0.04) and ƒT > 4 × MIC ( P = 0.02) increased likelihood of clinical cure at day 7 of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the emergence of bacterial resistance or clinical outcomes were observed between intermittent and continuous infusions. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment may be associated with a clinical cure on day 7.

Metabolomics Method in Understanding and Sensitizing Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii to Meropenem.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) strains are prevalent worldwide and represent a major threat to public health. However, treatment options for infections caused by CRAB are very limited as they are resistant to most of the commonly used antibiotics. Consequently, understanding the mechanisms underlying carbapenem resistance and restoring bacterial susceptibility to carbapenems hold immense importance. The present study used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolomics to investigate the metabolic mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in clinically isolated CRAB. Inactivation of the pyruvate cycle and purine metabolism is the most typical characteristic of CRAB. The CRAB exhibited a reduction in the activity of enzymes involved in the pyruvate cycle, proton motive force, and ATP levels. This decline in central carbon metabolism resulted in a decrease in the metabolic flux of the α-ketoglutarate-glutamate-glutamine pathway toward purine metabolism, ultimately leading to a decline in adenine nucleotide interconversion. Exogenous adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) enhance the killing efficacy of Meropenem against CRAB. The combination of ATP and Meropenem also has a synergistic effect on eliminating CRAB persisters and the biofilm, as well as protecting mice against peritonitis-sepsis. This study presents a novel therapeutic modality to treat infections caused by CRAB based on the metabolism reprogramming strategy.

Activated mesenchymal stem cells increase drug susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are major causes of hospital-acquired infections and sepsis. Due to increasing antibiotic resistance, new treatments are needed. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have antimicrobial effects, which can be enhanced by preconditioning with antibiotics. This study investigated using antibiotics to strengthen MSCs against MRSA and P. aeruginosa. MSCs were preconditioned with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin. Optimal antibiotic concentrations were determined by assessing MSC survival. Antimicrobial effects were measured by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and antimicrobial peptide (AMP) gene expression. Optimal antibiotic concentrations for preconditioning MSCs without reducing viability were 1 µg/mL for linezolid, meropenem, and cephalosporin and 2 µg/mL for vancomycin. In MIC assays, MSCs preconditioned with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin inhibited MRSA or P. aeruginosa growth at lower concentrations than non-preconditioned MSCs (p ≤ 0.001). In MBC assays, preconditioned MSCs showed enhanced bacterial clearance compared to non-preconditioned MSCs, especially when linezolid and vancomycin were used against MRSA (p ≤ 0.05). Preconditioned MSCs showed increased expression of genes encoding the antimicrobial peptide genes hepcidin and LL-37 compared to non-preconditioned MSCs. The highest hepcidin expression was seen with linezolid and vancomycin preconditioning (p ≤ 0.001). The highest LL-37 expression was with linezolid preconditioning (p ≤ 0.001). MSCs' preconditioning with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin at optimal concentrations enhances their antimicrobial effects against MRSA and P. aeruginosa without compromising viability. This suggests preconditioned MSCs could be an effective adjuvant treatment for antibiotic-resistant infections. The mechanism may involve upregulation of AMP genes.